Reasons Behind the Verdict in Nnamdi Kanu's Case Revealed by Retired Judge

 

During a valedictory court session held in Lagos, retired Justice Oludotun Adefope-Okojie, one of the three-member panel of justices at the Appeal Court that acquitted Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), of treasonable felony charges, disclosed the rationale behind their verdict. Justice Adefope-Okojie emphasized the judiciary's role as the last bastion of hope for the nation, urging it to prioritize justice above all else and remain independent from political influence.

Referencing her leading judgment in the Nnamdi vs Federal Republic of Nigeria case (Appeal No CA/ABJ/CR/625/2022), delivered on October 13, 2022, Justice Adefope-Okojie stressed the courts' duty to uphold the rule of law and hold the executive accountable for any acts of "executive lawlessness." She reaffirmed that no authority should contravene domestic and international laws to oppress its citizens.

Having served on the bench for 27 years, Justice Adefope-Okojie expressed concern over the lengthy duration of trials, averaging over five years at trial, more than three years at the Court of Appeal, and approximately 12 years at the Supreme Court. She highlighted the importance of an efficient and responsive court system for attracting foreign investment and emphasized the need for expeditious resolution of judicial disputes to maintain investor confidence.

To expedite justice delivery, Justice Adefope-Okojie suggested the judiciary embrace arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism. She reasoned that no country or business desires to invest in a nation where legal disputes linger indefinitely.

Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, President of the Court of Appeal, commended Justice Adefope-Okojie as a diligent, impartial, and courteous jurist. Governor Dapo Abiodun of Ogun State also lauded the retiring Justice for leaving a positive and impactful legacy in the legal profession.